Butterfly Innerforce Layer ZLC vs Butterfly Zhang Jike ALC: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-11 · blade

Butterfly Innerforce Layer ZLCButterfly Zhang Jike ALC
Our rating8.7/108.7/10
feelSoft ZLC feel, woody touch, excellent dwell timemedium-hard but flexible, crisp carbon with long dwell
handleFL / ST / AN / CSFL/ST/AN
plies7-ply, 5 wood + 2 ZL carbon (inner)5W+2 Arylate-Carbon (5 wood plies with 2 Arylate-Carbon layers)
speedOFF+OFF
thickness_mm5.75.8
weight_g85-9488

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

Both rate 8.7 but serve different offensive priorities. The Innerforce Layer ZLC pushes harder with OFF+ speed, dwell and control that reward aggressive close-to-mid-distance players. The Zhang Jike ALC sacrifices outright speed for a softer, more flexible carbon feel and long dwell time that excels at looping and imparting spin across the board.

The ALC’s core advantage is rubber compatibility and looping consistency. It pairs equally well with European tensor or tacky Chinese forehand rubber, and its soft carbon feel means looping works away from the table and on counter-loops. The ZLC’s smaller sweet spot and low throw angle demand more from the player but deliver more raw speed and precision. Choose the ZLC if you drive hard from distance; choose the ALC if you need a spin-first blade that stays controllable and plays well with both rubber families.

FAQ

Which is faster?

ZLC (OFF+ vs OFF). The ZLC delivers more mid-distance power.

Which is better for looping?

Zhang Jike ALC. Its long dwell time excels at looping and away-from-table play; ZLC is more for aggressive close shots.

Which is more flexible with rubbers?

Zhang Jike ALC. It works well with both tensor and tacky Chinese rubbers, while ZLC’s low throw angle clashes with tacky setups.

Which has a bigger sweet spot?

ALC has a larger sweet spot than ZLC for this generation of ALC blades.

Which is better available now?

ZLC. The ALC has been heading toward discontinuation, affecting availability.