Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | soft, grippy, wood-like with carbon activation on full swings | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 ALC (Arylate-Carbon inner fiber) | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | OFF- | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 5.9 | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | 88 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC
Check price on AmazonRead the full Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC review →
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.7/10.
Choose Stiga Cybershape Carbon if: You need balanced performance across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.4/10.
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC scores higher (8.7 vs. 8.4), indicating superior overall performance for its intended playstyle.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Stiga Cybershape Carbon delivers better value. Stiga Cybershape Carbon combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.