Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC vs Nittaku Acoustic: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC | Nittaku Acoustic | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| feel | soft, grippy, wood-like with carbon activation on full swings | Crisp all-wood feel with a large sweet spot, long dwell and a signature acoustic sound |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | FL/ST |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 ALC (Arylate-Carbon inner fiber) | 5-ply all wood (Limba outer veneers over a tung and ayous core) |
| speed | OFF- | OFF- |
| thickness_mm | 5.9 | 5.7 |
| weight_g | 88 | 88 |
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC
Check price on AmazonRead the full Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC review →
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.7/10.
Choose Nittaku Acoustic if: You need forgiving control across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.7/10.
Both earn equal ratings. The choice depends on whether you prefer Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC’s specific strengths over Nittaku Acoustic’s design philosophy.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Nittaku Acoustic delivers better value. Nittaku Acoustic combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.