Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC vs Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC | Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| feel | soft, grippy, wood-like with carbon activation on full swings | Soft — flexible ALC gives a more wood-like feel than other carbon blades; high dwell time |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | Shakehand (FL, AN, ST options); shorter anatomic handle than Viscaria |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 ALC (Arylate-Carbon inner fiber) | 5 wood + 2 arylate-carbon (ALC) — 7-ply construction with koto outer layers and inner arylate-carbon fiber |
| speed | OFF- | OFF (Butterfly rates Reaction 118, mid-fast; equivalent to OFF/OFF+ class) |
| thickness_mm | 5.9 | 5.7mm |
| weight_g | 88 | 84-87g typical (Butterfly spec approx 87g) |
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC
Check price on AmazonRead the full Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC review →
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.7/10.
Choose Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC if: You need balanced performance across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.7/10.
Both earn equal ratings. The choice depends on whether you prefer Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC’s specific strengths over Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC’s design philosophy.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC delivers better value. Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.