Butterfly Glayzer vs Tibhar Evolution FX-P: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-11 · rubber

Butterfly GlayzerTibhar Evolution FX-P
Our rating8.2/108.4/10
best_sideForehand or Backhand (all-round offensive)Backhand or allround forehand
controlHigh68
speed81 (manufacturer)94
spin73 (manufacturer)98
sponge_hardness38 degrees (JPN)approx 40 degrees (softest in Evolution line)
typeInverted / High Tension (Spring Sponge X)Inverted / tensor
weight_uncut_garound 48g uncut68

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

FX-P (8.4 rating) stands out as the forgiving choice in the Evolution range, while Glayzer (8.2) offers Butterfly pedigree at lower cost. Both prioritize spin and control; FX-P’s softer 40-degree sponge gives even higher forgiveness on mishits than Glayzer, with outstanding dwell time on loops. Yet FX-P caps out on speed—aggressive hitters will hit its ceiling—and struggles lifting heavy backspin from mid to far distance.

Glayzer provides more balanced speed alongside control, accessing Dignics topsheet advantages. Its moderate weight and durability make it practical for regular training, whereas FX-P’s topsheet durability varies by user. Both suit intermediate all-round players, but FX-P is explicitly optimized for backhand or flexy blades where its low speed and high consistency shine.

Pick Glayzer for all-round balance and durability. Pick FX-P if you play backhand-heavy or want maximum error forgiveness and don’t need aggressive top-end power.

FAQ

Which is softer?

FX-P at 40 degrees is slightly softer than Glayzer’s 38 degrees, though both are soft by modern standards.

Which is more forgiving?

FX-P explicitly targets high error forgiveness with long dwell time. Glayzer is consistent and forgiving but less specialized.

Which has more speed?

Glayzer is faster. FX-P has limited top-end speed for aggressive hitters.

Which is better for lifting backspin?

Glayzer handles this better. FX-P struggles lifting heavy backspin from mid-distance.