Butterfly Glayzer vs Nittaku Hammond Z2: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Glayzer | Nittaku Hammond Z2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 |
| best_side | Forehand or Backhand (all-round offensive) | forehand |
| control | High | 7.5 |
| speed | 81 (manufacturer) | 9.0 |
| spin | 73 (manufacturer) | 9.5 |
| sponge_hardness | 38 degrees (JPN) | 52 |
| type | Inverted / High Tension (Spring Sponge X) | inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | around 48g uncut | 70 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Butterfly Glayzer and Nittaku Hammond Z2 represent opposing strategies for offensive play despite both being Japanese rubber technologies. Glayzer emphasizes forgiveness, consistency, and broad appeal through its 38-degree sponge and Dignics topsheet, making it accessible for intermediate players across a wide range of blade pairings and skill levels. It avoids extremes and delivers reliable performance without demanding active, well-timed contact.
Hammond Z2 is a hard, unforgiving tensor that demands active, explosive strokes and rewards elite technique with exceptional looping power, spin output, and durability. Its 52-degree hardness and non-ESN character suit upper-intermediate and advanced offensive specialists who play aggressive counterlooping and smashing. It is polarizing—great for aggressive attackers but frustrating for passive or developing players. Glayzer is the teacher’s blade; Hammond Z2 is the specialist’s weapon.
FAQ
Which is suitable for beginners?
Only Glayzer—Hammond Z2 is unforgiving and demands solid footwork and active contact.
Which lasts longer in competition?
Hammond Z2 offers above-average durability compared to typical ESN tensors. Glayzer is also durable but not exceptional.
Can Hammond Z2 be used for blocking and short game?
Not reliably. It demands active, well-timed strokes; passive contact leads to errors.
Which generates more spin?
Hammond Z2 edges out Glayzer on spin output due to its hard sponge and elite Nittaku topsheet technology.