Butterfly Freitas ALC vs Stiga Emerald VPS V: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-15 · blade

Butterfly Freitas ALCStiga Emerald VPS V
Our rating8.5/108.3/10
feelMedium-softStiff, hard outer surface with medium throw angle and large sweet spot
handleFlared/Straight/AnatomicFlared (FL), also available in ST and Chinese pen
plies5+2 arylate carbon (ALC) outer — Limba-ALC-Limba-Ayous-Limba-ALC-Limba5-ply all wood (Ebenholz/dark outer, VPS-treated middle veneers)
speedOFFOFF+
thickness_mm5.76.2
weight_g8898

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

Freitas (OFF, 88g) and Emerald VPS V (OFF+, 98g) take opposite approaches: Freitas is controlled carbon consistency; Emerald VPS V is maximum speed from all-wood. Emerald uses Green Ebenholz, VPS-treated middle veneers, and Diamond Touch surface hardening—premium all-wood engineering delivering OFF+ pace at weight cost. Freitas is lighter, faster on dwell, and more versatile.

Freitas suits all-round looping players seeking balanced pace and control. Emerald VPS V is built for counter-looping specialists and advanced attackers playing mid-to-far table. Its heavy weight (near 98g) risks fatigue in extended sessions; stiff construction punishes weak technique. Both are premium investments, but Freitas is more forgiving and versatile. Emerald VPS V is the choice for confident attackers prioritizing maximum all-wood speed; Freitas suits players balancing speed with control.

FAQ

Why is Emerald VPS V so heavy?

Dense Ebenholz wood and VPS treatment add mass for strength and stability. The weight contributes to counter-looping momentum, but causes fatigue over long sessions.

Is Emerald VPS V suitable for control-oriented play?

No. At OFF+ speed with stiff construction, it’s built for aggressive pace generation, not touch. Freitas is far superior for balanced control-and-pace play.

Which blade punishes poor technique more?

Emerald VPS V significantly. Its stiff Ebenholz construction demands consistent, clean contact. Freitas’ soft dwell and carbon forgiveness are much more accommodating to developing technique.