Butterfly Falcima vs Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Falcima | Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 |
| feel | Soft | Medium |
| handle | Flared/Chinese Penhold | FL|ST |
| plies | 5 all wood (Koto/Koto/Kiri/Koto/Koto) | 5 wood + 2 carbon (inner FE carbon) |
| speed | OFF- | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6 | 5.5 |
| weight_g | 87 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Butterfly Falcima rates 7.8/10, while Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner rates 8.2/10. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner edges out slightly in overall rating. Both are premium options for serious players.
Butterfly Falcima suits offensive. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner is better for offensive. Your best choice depends on which style matches your game.
Both products offer solid quality and performance. Select based on your skill level, preferred playing style, and feel preference.
FAQ
What is the main difference between Butterfly Falcima and Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner?
Butterfly Falcima is designed for offensive, while Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner targets offensive. They optimize for different playing approaches.
Which should I choose?
Choose Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner for the highest-rated option and offensive. Choose Butterfly Falcima if you prefer offensive or have different budget constraints.
Which is better for beginners?
If you are new to the sport, start with the option that feels more forgiving. Both products are better suited for intermediate or advanced players with developed technique.
How do speed and control compare?
Butterfly Falcima has off- speed. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner offers off speed. Check the full spec table for detailed ratings.
Are these products durable?
Both products are well-made and durable with proper care. Regular maintenance and appropriate use will extend the lifespan of either option.