Andro Treiber Z vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Andro Treiber Z | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | mild, crispy, low vibration, large sweet spot | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL, ST, AN, Chinese pen | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 7-ply: kiso hinoki outer + ZLC (Z-fiber composite) inner layers + wood core | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | OFF | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 6.6-6.8 | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | 87-90 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Treiber Z (8.7) delivers composite versatility with oval blade geometry familiar to most players. Massive sweet spot, predictable control, and multi-distance capability suit varied advanced attackers.
Cybershape Carbon (8.4) features exceptional KTH lab-verified larger sweet spot positioned higher via hexagonal shape, head-heavy balance aiding backhand acceleration, and speed rating of 9 out of 10 comparable to Koto-ALC class blades. CCF inner carbon preserves woody feel while adding stiffness. However, short dwell time challenges looping styles, angular head shape requires adaptation, and premium price around 220 EUR makes it expensive.
Both suit advanced players; dramatically different approaches. Treiber for all-distance control-attack versatility in familiar oval shape. Cybershape for advanced offensive blockers and counter-attackers seeking superior sweet spot geometry and backhand acceleration.
FAQ
How different is the hexagonal shape?
Distinctly different serve angles and bat angle awareness. Requires adaptation from oval blade players.
Is Cybershape really faster?
Yes, rated 9 out of 10 comparable to Koto-ALC class blades. Treiber is solid but not quite there.
Can I loop with Cybershape?
Possible but challenging. Short dwell time is better suited to blocking and counter-attacking.
Is the price justified?
For advanced counter-attackers seeking superior geometry and speed, yes. Otherwise, Treiber Z is better value.
Who should buy Cybershape?
Advanced counter-attackers and backhand-dominant players. Treiber Z for all-distance versatility.