Andro Treiber Z vs Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner: Which Should You Buy?
| Andro Treiber Z | Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 |
| feel | mild, crispy, low vibration, large sweet spot | Medium |
| handle | FL, ST, AN, Chinese pen | FL|ST |
| plies | 7-ply: kiso hinoki outer + ZLC (Z-fiber composite) inner layers + wood core | 5 wood + 2 carbon (inner FE carbon) |
| speed | OFF | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6.6-6.8 | 5.5 |
| weight_g | 87-90 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both products are competitive in the table tennis market. Andro Treiber Z achieves a rating of 8.7. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner achieves a rating of 8.2. Andro Treiber Z is suited for advanced offensive players who prioritize control and consistency alongside speed, and who want a versatile composite blade that excels at both close-to-table play and mid-distance looping. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner is suited for intermediate to advanced close-to-table attackers who prioritize spin, consistency, and touch over raw speed. Andro Treiber Z offers outstanding speed-to-control ratio for an off-class composite blade. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner provides outstanding control and spin performance validated across dozens of reviews.
FAQ
Is Andro Treiber Z right for me?
Advanced offensive players who prioritize control and consistency alongside speed, and who want a versatile composite blade that excels at both close-to-table play and mid-distance looping
Is Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner right for me?
Intermediate to advanced close-to-table attackers who prioritize spin, consistency, and touch over raw speed
What makes Andro Treiber Z stand out?
Huge sweet spot delivers even, predictable returns even on off-center contacts
What makes Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner stand out?
Inner FE carbon adds power on drives without stiffening the feel
Which should I choose?
Choose Andro Treiber Z for higher overall ratings. Choose Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner for beginner friendliness.