Andro Treiber Z vs Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC: Which Should You Buy?
| Andro Treiber Z | Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| feel | mild, crispy, low vibration, large sweet spot | soft, grippy, wood-like with carbon activation on full swings |
| handle | FL, ST, AN, Chinese pen | FL/ST/AN |
| plies | 7-ply: kiso hinoki outer + ZLC (Z-fiber composite) inner layers + wood core | 5 wood + 2 ALC (Arylate-Carbon inner fiber) |
| speed | OFF | OFF- |
| thickness_mm | 6.6-6.8 | 5.9 |
| weight_g | 87-90 | 88 |
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC
Check price on AmazonRead the full Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC review →
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Andro Treiber Z if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.7/10.
Choose Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC if: You need forgiving control across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.7/10.
Both earn equal ratings. The choice depends on whether you prefer Andro Treiber Z’s specific strengths over Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC’s design philosophy.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Andro Treiber Z offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC delivers better value. Butterfly Harimoto Tomokazu Innerforce ALC combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.